# ECW performance

**URL:** <https://community.thinkgeo.com/t/ecw-performance/463>\
**Category:** WinForms\
**Created:** [June 6, 2009, 1:15pm UTC](https://community.thinkgeo.com/t/ecw-performance/463 "2009-06-06T13:15:12Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mic\_halperin](https://community.thinkgeo.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/c0e974/32.png) [@mic\_halperin](https://community.thinkgeo.com/u/mic_halperin)\
**Post date:** [June 6, 2009, 1:15pm UTC](https://community.thinkgeo.com/t/ecw-performance/463/1 "2009-06-06T13:15:12Z")

</div>

Hi,  
  
I'm&nbsp;using&nbsp;EcwRasterLayer&nbsp;to&nbsp;load&nbsp;ecw&nbsp;images&nbsp;of&nbsp;up&nbsp;to&nbsp;10&nbsp;GB.  
  
Overall&nbsp;it&nbsp;works&nbsp;nice,&nbsp;however&nbsp;I&nbsp;would&nbsp;like&nbsp;to&nbsp;know&nbsp;if&nbsp;there&nbsp;are&nbsp;any&nbsp;possible&nbsp;optimizations&nbsp;or&nbsp;recommendations&nbsp;in&nbsp;order&nbsp;to&nbsp;improve&nbsp;performance&nbsp;of&nbsp;some&nbsp;basic&nbsp;operations&nbsp;like&nbsp;pan&nbsp;and&nbsp;zoom.

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ben](https://community.thinkgeo.com/user_avatar/community.thinkgeo.com/ben/32/25720_2.png) [@Ben](https://community.thinkgeo.com/u/Ben)\
**Post date:** [June 8, 2009, 4:24am UTC](https://community.thinkgeo.com/t/ecw-performance/463/2 "2009-06-08T04:24:41Z")

</div>

Michael,

We&nbsp;are&nbsp;using&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;third&nbsp;part&nbsp;dll&nbsp;for&nbsp;EcwRasterLayer&nbsp;and&nbsp;MrSidRasterLayer.&nbsp;There&nbsp;is&nbsp;a&nbsp;knonw&nbsp;issue&nbsp;that&nbsp;we&nbsp;didn't&nbsp;take&nbsp;a&nbsp;good&nbsp;advantage&nbsp;of&nbsp;the&nbsp;built-in&nbsp;caching&nbsp;for&nbsp;MrSid,&nbsp;and&nbsp;I&nbsp;think&nbsp;maybe&nbsp;we&nbsp;have&nbsp;the&nbsp;same&nbsp;issue&nbsp;for&nbsp;EcwRasterLayer.&nbsp;We&nbsp;haven't&nbsp;solved&nbsp;this&nbsp;problem&nbsp;andI&nbsp;think&nbsp;there&nbsp;should&nbsp;have&nbsp;some&nbsp;performance&nbsp;improvements&nbsp;after&nbsp;we&nbsp;figure&nbsp;it&nbsp;out.&nbsp;Maybe&nbsp;in&nbsp;the&nbsp;next&nbsp;version,&nbsp;we&nbsp;will&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;faster&nbsp;MrSid/Ecw&nbsp;Raster&nbsp;Layer.

Here&nbsp;is&nbsp;the&nbsp;link&nbsp;about&nbsp;MrSid's&nbsp;performance&nbsp;issue,&nbsp;please&nbsp;have&nbsp;a&nbsp;look&nbsp;if&nbsp;you&nbsp;are&nbsp;interested.

[gis.thinkgeo.com/Support/Dis...fault.aspx](http://gis.thinkgeo.com/Support/DiscussionForums/tabid/143/afv/topic/aff/12/aft/5259/afpg/1/Default.aspx)

Thanks,

Bai
